Go Back   MP3Unsigned Forum > Music Creation > DAW Zone


DAW Zone Questions, tips and tricks for Digital Audio Workstations - Cubase, FL Studio, Albleton, ProTools etc

"
"
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

 
  
Old 18-07-2010, 20:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cubase 5: Anyone use it? Is it Good?
TonyMiller TonyMiller is offline 18-07-2010, 20:52 PM

The thread title says it all... Is it worth me saving me pennies for Cubase 5? Or should I stick to me ancient SX 2?


 
TonyMiller's Avatar
TonyMiller
Software Librarian
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,744
Views: 1025
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 09:56 AM
*** VIP ***
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 843
Rep Power: 0
Nikjam & Meena is on a distinguished road
Default

we used cubase sx 3 for along time and then last year decided it was outdated - so we moved to ableton, which is amazing. it takes some time to change the way you work fromt he cubase way, but everything is done much better. now we havent tried cubase 5 so cant comment, but basically what im saying is dont just look at cubase when deciding where to go next software wise, also have a look at ableton
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 10:08 AM

James Oakwood's Avatar

*** GIT ***
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,860
Rep Power: 82
James Oakwood will become famous soon enoughJames Oakwood will become famous soon enough
Default

Tony,

I'm on cubase 4 and it's phenominal compared to SX - loads more soft synths that I've only just scratched the surface on - it'll suit your milltronica stuff for sure. Dunno if Hank'd approve tho!!! C5 is an upgraded version of C4 but i don't reckon it's the significant quantum leap that 4 was over sx. I'll die hugging cubase and mr. steinberg. Does that make me gay?

Andy
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 10:45 AM

Superhuman's Avatar

Site Coder, Axe Shredder and Banner of Spamming Idiots
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,132
Rep Power: 100
Superhuman is a name known to allSuperhuman is a name known to allSuperhuman is a name known to allSuperhuman is a name known to allSuperhuman is a name known to allSuperhuman is a name known to all
Default

I've been thinking of making the upgrade too but was wondering if it really was any better. I'm on SX3 at the moment but noticed that performance hit the floor when I switched to XP Pro 64bit - which surprised me. Turns out the 32bit software doesnt perform very well on 64 bit systems Might look at Cubase 5 if I can get some readies together
__________________
FYI...
Superhuman = Amadeus.
Amadeus = Retired from community management
Superhuman = Still developing mp3unsigned
Darth Raver = Forum Administrator

Any questions?.... ask Darth Raver!

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 15:05 PM

TonyMiller's Avatar

Software Librarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,744
Rep Power: 104
TonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Oakwood View Post
Tony,

I'm on cubase 4 and it's phenominal compared to SX - loads more soft synths that I've only just scratched the surface on - it'll suit your milltronica stuff for sure. Dunno if Hank'd approve tho!!! C5 is an upgraded version of C4 but i don't reckon it's the significant quantum leap that 4 was over sx. I'll die hugging cubase and mr. steinberg. Does that make me gay?

Andy
Yes, but I knew that any way...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 17:06 PM
*** VIP ***
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,538
Rep Power: 71
geiger167 has a spectacular aura aboutgeiger167 has a spectacular aura about
Default

A better question would be what are you hoping an update will do for you. Are you unhappy with your mixes, plugins, effects etc on what you have ? Your mixes are pretty pro sounding now, is there an aspect you are unhappy with or is the sound palette of your cubase feeling a bit outdated now ? You may better of with a new sampler like Kontakt, or better still, Komplete (which includes Kontakt and many more instruments) You then have the advantage of some new sounds (reaktor, kontakt, fm8, massive, abysnth etc) and effects (guitar rig 4, reaktor fx etc) and drums (battery, and the drum machines in reaktor) Personally I'm of the view 'it it aint broke don't fix it' and unless you are specifically unhappy with something why change ?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 17:23 PM

TonyMiller's Avatar

Software Librarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,744
Rep Power: 104
TonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to beholdTonyMiller is a splendid one to behold
Default

That sounds like a plan... having said that, reviews I have read for Cubase 5 lead me to believe the editing and mixing tools are much improved. I think I'll keep the money I haven't got and wait a while...

Thanks folks.

And thanks Mr. Geiger for the kind word on my mixes so far...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 19-07-2010, 23:32 PM

m4rt3z's Avatar

One Of McLovins Entourage
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Derry, Ireland
Posts: 4,511
Rep Power: 135
m4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud ofm4rt3z has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Oakwood View Post
I'll die hugging cubase and mr. steinberg. Does that make me gay?

Andy
You really mean Mr Yamaha!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 20-07-2010, 15:05 PM
*** VIP ***
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,631
Rep Power: 0
GavV is on a distinguished road
Default

I have only done a few projects so far and they have all been reason 4 rewired into C5 with all the signal processing in C5. I can't see what advantage C5 would offer for someone who mixes live tracks like rock etc because everything can prob be done in SX2 just as good. If however you want a much improved Cubase which is easier to use and has all those little features that you currently have to work around, then as long as it is affordable you should go for it, I can't see how anyone can regret owning C5. Again though, if it is just to record guitars and drums etc to mix them down then SX2 is equal to this task. I can honestly say that I haven't used one of the plugins that came with it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 20-07-2010, 16:44 PM

Ciao4Now's Avatar

retired for now...
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 905
Rep Power: 39
Ciao4Now has a spectacular aura aboutCiao4Now has a spectacular aura aboutCiao4Now has a spectacular aura about
Default

I use Cubase 5 and find it to be a remarkably pleasant piece of software. Very similar to SX3 but there's tonnes more on it and I find it quicker, lighter on the CPU and has a better layout once you get used to it.
Well worth saving the pennies for it.

T-Bone
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cubase, good


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:38 AM.